IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B.A. No. 5771 of 2022

Md. Asfak Alam

…… Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Naznin Naaz

……Opposite parties

----------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

-----

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Tiwari, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P.

For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate.

…..

Order No.07/ Dated:18.01.2023

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 07 of

2022 instituted under Sections 323/ 498A/ 504/ 506 and 34 of the Indian

Penal Code and Section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act 1961, the

petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is

innocent and has committed no offence at all rather he has been falsely

implicated in this case in order to extort money from the petitioner. The

allegations are false, fabricated, general and omnibus in nature. Real fact

is that informant does not want to reside with the petitioner