SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 1475

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
AMIT KUMAR SINHA – Appellant
Versus
INDU BALA DEVI – Respondent
FA 109 / 2024



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 109 of 2024 Amit Kumar Sinha, aged about 40 years, s/o Shri Keshar Prasad, R/o

1.

Good and the Great Academy, Siksha Nagar, Bajar Samiti, Bari Pahari, Bihar Sharif, P.O.-Sohsarai, P.S.-Laheri, District-Nalanda (Bihar).

… … Appellant Versus Indu Bala Devi, aged about 55 years, w/o Sri Sudhir Kumar, R/o Flat No.501, 1 Block, Hariom Tower Residency, Circular Road, P.O. &

P.S. Lalpur, District-Ranchi.

… … Respondent -------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR -------

For the Appellant : Mr. Rishi Pallava, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Neeharika Mazumdar, Advocate Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate ----------------------------

CAV/Reserved on 01.05.2025 Pronounced on 08/05/2025 Per Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.

1. The instant appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act, 1984 is directed against the order/judgment dated 17.01.2024 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Additional Family Court-I, Ranchi in Original Suit No. 308 of 2022, whereby and whereunder, the issue of jurisdiction raised by way of preliminary objection by the appellant has been rejected holding the jurisdiction of the case to be of the Ranchi Family Court.

2. The brief facts of the case as per the pleading made in the instant appeal needs to be referred herein as under:

The respondent has filed Original (Guardian) Suit No. 308 of

2022 against the appellant under Section 7 and 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 with a prayer for getting the custody of her grandchildren, namely, Shaanvi and Anmay.

The said original suit was filed by the respondent on the ground that she is the maternal grandmother (Naani) of both the children who were born out of the wedlock of the present appellant and her deceased daughter (wife of the appellant), who died on 17.05.2021 due to COVID- 19. Before the death of the daughter of the respondent, deceased daughter of the respondent and her grandchildren were residing in Ranchi and on 08.11.2021, the present appellant had taken both the children and maid from their house for consulting them to a doctor and thereafter, after dropping the maid in Bariatu, has taken both the children with him to Bihar Sharif, Nalanda.

The present appellant appeared in the aforesaid original suit after getting notice and filed his written statement on 19.05.2023 raising the issue of jurisdiction in entertaining the present suit by the learned Family Judge, Ranchi as also raised the issue of maintainability of the suit against him stating that the appellant being the father of the children, he is the natural guardian of the children. The appellant is a native of Bihar Sharif, Nalanda and children are living with the appellant at his native place, i.e., Bihar Sharif, Nalanda with his family.

On 19.05.2023, the appellant filed a separate preliminary objection on the jurisdiction and maintainability of the original suit No. 308 of 2022 and during the course of argument, the appellant filed some documents relating to his children, i.e., Admission Form, Aadhar Card and Aadhar Enrolment Form. Thereafter, the respondent filed rejoinder on 26.06.2023 stating therein that since the appellant and children along with the deceased mother were residing at Ranchi before 08.11.2021, as such, the learned Family Court, Ranchi is having the jurisdiction to entertain the original suit.

The learned Family Court, Ranchi, in course thereof, has dismissed the preliminary objection dated 19.05.2023 on 17.01.2024 filed by the appellant, against which the present appeal has been preferred.

3. It is evident from the factual aspect as referred hereinabove which led to filing of the present appeal that the respondent has filed Original (Guardian) Suit No. 308 of 2022 against the appellant with a prayer for getting the custody of her grandchildren, namely, Shaanvi and Anmay on the ground that she is the maternal grandmother (Naani) of both the children who were bor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top