Back
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J
Rajendra Saw – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging award compensation for land acquisition. (Para 6) |
| 2. petitioners have a remedy. (Para 7) |
| 3. writ petition disposed with liberty granted. (Para 8) |
CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY .........
For the Petitioner (s) : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Advocate Mr. Ram Chander Sahu, Advocate For the State : Mr. A. Kumar, AC to GA.I For the NHAI : Mrs. Sweety Topno, Advocate …...
13/ 16.06.2025. Heard, learned counsel for the parties.
1. Petitioners are aggrieved by the Award of compensation for the land acquired for NH.31 (Barhi- Rajauli Section) under National Highway Authority Act, 1956 vide Notification No.543 (E) and for payment of adequate compensation in terms of provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 .
2. The facts of this case are not in dispute that the land measuring total area of 5.925 acres was acquired for laning/ widening of National Highway No.31, Barhi- Rajauli Under Section 3A of the National Highway Act, 1956.
3. Subsequent to the said acquisition, estimate for compensation was issued by the Government of India vide Notification dated 14.02.2017 amending
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
