HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J
Sugandha Singh – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Prasad Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. sufficient cause for delay must be substantiated. (Para 11 , 12) |
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI -----
For the Appellants : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate Mr. Shubham Mishra, Advocate Mr. Kanishka Deo, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate Mr. Ritesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate Mr. Prakhar Harit, Advocate Mr. K. Hari, Advocate, Advocate -----
06/12.06.2025 Heard Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. This second appeal has been filed on 08.04.2024 and it is barred by
525 days.
3. Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that for condonation of delay of 525 days, I.A. No.10652 of 2024 has been filed. He submits that the appellants have filed the instant second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 23.12.2022 (decree signed on 05.01.2023) passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Garhwa in Civil Appeal No.05 of 2020, whereby, the appeal filed by the respondent has been allowed and the judgment and decree dated 04.02.2016 (decree signed on 23.02.2016) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division) No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.