Back
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J
Pitam Kahar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's order emphasized reinstatement and benefits. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on the nature of 'consequential benefits'. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's clarification regarding back wages not covered. (Para 6 , 7) |
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Om Prakash Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Amit Kumar, S.C Mines-II For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate Mr. Vineet Sinha, Advocate ---
Order No.12 Dated 28th July, 2025 Heard Mr. Om Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2.
2. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willful and deliberate violation of the order of this Court dated 14.09.2023 passed in W.P.(S)
No. 4525 of 2021.
3. The operative part of the order dated 14.09.2023 passed in W.P.(S)
No. 4525 of 2021 reads as follows:
“5. In view of the aforesaid facts, therefore, the impugned letter no. P.O./NLOCP-DBOCP/Retirement/2020/1032 dated 1.8.2020 is hereby quashed and set aside with a further direction to the respondent no. 3 to reinstate the petitioner in service. The petiti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
