Back
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Sujit Narayan Prasad, Arun Kumar Rai, JJ
Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand & Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of advocacy and concerns regarding road usage. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details on construction impact and responsibilities. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. development of potential funding solutions under csr. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. conclusion to continue proceedings. (Para 8) |
Coram:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI -------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sahnaj Akhtar, A.C. to A.A.G-III For the Res.No.6 : Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate -----
Order No.05/Dated 21.08.2025
1. Heard Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.6 and Mr. Sahnaj Akhtar, learned A.C. to A.A.G-III.
2. Primarily the question involved is with respect to the approach road from the mining operation area, a part of which is now being taken over by Prime Minister Gram Sadak Yojna (PMGSY) which is being maintained by respondent no.6. It is the grievance of the writ petitioner that there is hindrances being created by the people in general and the State authority in smooth transportation of the minerals from the mining area towards the main approach road
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
