Back
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
A. Kumar, J
DHARMENDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
RUKMINI DEVI And ANR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. declaratory suit regarding gift deed validity. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defendants claim self-acquisition of property. (Para 3) |
| 3. trial court ruled gift deed invalid. (Para 4) |
| 4. appellate court believes gift deed valid. (Para 5) |
| 5. substantial questions of law challenged. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 6. review of findings from both courts. (Para 9) |
| 7. ownership dispute over the property acquisition. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 8. burden of proof in property ownership. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 9. legal substance in appellant's claims found lacking. (Para 15) |
| 10. appeal dismissed with no merits. (Para 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
C.A.V. on 02.07.2025 Pronounced on 14/07/2025The instant Second Appeal has been preferred being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment dated 04.03.2011 and decree dated 18.03.2011 passed by learned Additional District Judge-Fast Track Court-II, Giridih in Title Appeal No. 53 of 2008 reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 17.09.2008 (decree signed and sealed on 30.09.2008) passed by Sub-Judge-I, Giridih in Title Suit No. 26 of 2003.
2. The plaintiff (appellant herein) filed the suit for declaration that the deed of gift No. 3221 dated 24.07.2002 executed by defendant No. 2 in favour of defend
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
