I.A. No.3423 of 2008 in W.P. (C) No.6918 of 2005:

1. The present interlocutory application was filed on behalf of the petitioner on 1^st December, 2008 for amendment in the writ petition primarily challenging the letter dated 20^th October, 2008 issued by Additional Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, whereby the General Manager of the petitioner company was directed to pay the market value of the land in question to the heirs of Late Madhusudan Mahto.

2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid letter was issued during the pendency of the writ petition. Under the said circumstance, the petitioner may be permitted to make amendment in paragraph no.1 as well as prayer portion of the writ petition as proposed in paragraph no.4 of the present interlocutory application.

3. Having heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State and for the reasons stated in the present interlocutory application, the petitioner is permitted to amend paragraph no.1 as well as prayer portion of the writ petition as proposed in paragraph no.4 of the present interlocutory application.

4. Necessary amendment in the relevant paragraph(s) of the writ petition be made by the counsel for the petitioner within a week.

5. I.A. No.3423 of 2008 is, accordingly, disposed of.

I.A. No.3230 of 2011 and I.A. No.4882 of 2020 in W.P.

(C) No.6918 of 2005:

6. Both the interlocutory applications have been filed on behalf of the respondent no.4-Paritosh Mahato praying inter-alia to pass an order of status quo with respect to the land appertaining to Plot Nos.651 & 648 measuring an area of 2.47 acres, Mouza-Gumriagora during the pendency of the writ petition.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that an interim order was already passed by this Court on 7^th May, 2010 as well as on 15^th December, 2010, I see no reason to entertain the said prayer of the respondent no.4 made in the present interlocutory applications.

8. I.A. No.3230 of 2011 and I.A. No.4882 of 2020 are, accordingly, dismissed.

I.A. No.2765 of 2009 in Cont. Case (Civil) No.649 of 2008:

9. The present interlocutory application was filed on behalf of the petitioner on 8^th September, 2009 for early hearing of this case.

10. Since both the cases have already been taken up on board, there is no need to pass any further order in the present interlocutory application.

11. I.A. No.2765 of 2009 is, accordingly, disposed of.