Back
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Sujit Narayan Prasad, Sanjay Prasad, JJ
Amresh Raut @ Amresh Rawat – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of appellant's case and conviction details. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding the victim's testimony and prosecution evidence. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. opening statement supporting the victim’s testimony. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. analysis of the victim's testimony and fir delay. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. legal context on consent under the pocso act. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. citations from case law regarding minor's consent. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. court's view on the irrelevance of consent for minors. (Para 20) |
| 8. decision on the interlocutory application. (Para 21) |
| 9. conclusion and order dismissing the application. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD -------
For the Appellant : Mr. M.I. Khan, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, APP ------
Order No.10/Dated: 16th January, 2025 I.A. No. 5203 of 2024
1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed under Section 389 (1)
of the Cr.P.C for keeping the sentence in abeyance in connection with the judgment of conviction dated 15.02.2024 and order of sentence dated 16.02.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1-cum- Spe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
