SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 8692

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Ananda Sen, J
Salon Lomga v. Hanna Lomga


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Yogendra Prasad
For the Respondents: Mrs. Shilpi Sandil Gadodia

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant Mr. Yogendra Prasad and learned counsel Mrs. Shilpi Sandil Gadodia representing the respondent as a legal aid counsel.

2. By the impugned judgment dated 30.08.2016 and decree dated 09.09.2016 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa in Original Suit No.14/2015 the Suit for dissolution of marriage under S.10(ix) and (x) of the Divorce Act 1869 has been dismissed ex - parte since the respondent even after valid service of notice and through paper publication also did not appear to contest the Suit. The pleadings as made out in the plaint have therefore remained unrebutted. Appellant had adduced two witnesses: himself as P.W.2 and one Ishwar Lomga P.W.1 in support of his case. As per the pleadings of the Suit preferred by the petitioner / appellant herein, parties entered into marital relationship on 7th February 2012 at G.E.L. Church, Kadma (Khunti) and lived together for four days at the paternal place of the appellant at village Budungkel, P.O. Gudri, P.S. Sonuwa, District West Singhbhum as husband and wife. Thereafter without any rhyme or reason she left the place and has never returned despite efforts ma













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top