SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 4014

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Anant Bijay Singh, J
Rajdeo Mochi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


1. The present Criminal Revision No. 638 of 2003 has been filed on behalf of the petitioners challenging the judgment dated 24.03.2003 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 63 of 1992 by Sri Ramanuj Narain, VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj whereby VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj has partly allowed the Criminal Appeal No. 63 of 1992 with modification in the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.06.1992 passed by Sri Shayam Bihari Rai, then Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj by which the petitioners and 26 others have been acquitted for the offences under S.352 and S.353 of the Indian Penal Code and under S.2 of the Forest Conservation Act . However, the conviction of the petitioners and two others has been upheld for the offence under S.33 of the Indian Forest Act . Although vide the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.06.1992 passed by Sri Shayam Bihari Rai, then Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with C. F. Case No. 433 of 1990 corresponding to T. R. No. 80 of 1992 had convicted the petitioners and 26 others for the offences under S.352






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top