Back
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Anant Bijay Singh, J
Rajdeo Mochi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial convictions under various offences, focusing on specifics of forest act violations. (Para 1 , 12 , 18) |
| 2. arguments for leniency in sentencing due to prolonged trial and custody. (Para 2 , 19) |
| 3. insufficient independent evidence against petitioners; reliance on biased testimonies. (Para 24 , 30 , 41) |
| 4. final ruling reversing conviction due to lack of evidence. (Para 42 , 44) |
1. The present Criminal Revision No. 638 of 2003 has been filed on behalf of the petitioners challenging the judgment dated 24.03.2003 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 63 of 1992 by Sri Ramanuj Narain, VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj whereby VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj has partly allowed the Criminal Appeal No. 63 of 1992 with modification in the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.06.1992 passed by Sri Shayam Bihari Rai, then Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj by which the petitioners and 26 others have been acquitted for the offences under S.352 and S.353 of the Indian Penal Code and under S.2 of the Forest Conservation Act . However, the conviction of the petitioners and two oth
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
