SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 2

JHARKAND HIGH COURT
M. Y. Eqbal, J.
Maheshwari Brothers Ltd. Adityapur v. State of Jharkhand and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Kalyan Roy
For the Respondents: M. K. Laik

Table of Content
1. writ application challenges withholding of payment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments on legality of payment withholding. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's observation on mandatory rule compliance. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. final direction for compliance and payment release. (Para 9 , 10)

1. This writ application is directed against the letter No. 964 (Confidential) dated 27-7-2004 purported to have been issued by respondent No. 2, Deputy Commissioner East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur on the basis of which respondent No. 4 Treasury Officer, Jamshedpur stopped payment of cheque issued by respondent No. 3 Executive Engineer, Road Construction Division, Jamshedpur for a sum of Rs. 2,62,51,869/- and also for issuance of appropriate direction upon the respondents to pay the aforesaid amount under the aforesaid cheque.

2. Pursuant to the tender notice invited for construction of Four Lane road in Adityapur Kandra Road, petitioner being lowest bidder was awarded with the aforesaid construction work which commenced with effect from January, 2004. Petitioner said to have completed substantial portion of work and the Road Construction Department on being satisfied with the work executed by the petitioner


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top