Tripurari Mohan Prasad v. Union of India - 2006 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 2

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2006 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 2

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
, J
Tripurari Mohan Prasad v. Union of India

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges orders in multiple writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court evaluates relevance and necessity of summoned witnesses. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 10)
3. petitioner claims inadequate investigation by c.b.i. (Para 6 , 11)
4. court emphasizes proper grounds necessary for witness inclusion. (Para 8 , 9)
5. final dismissal of writ petitions without merits presented. (Para 13)

1The petitioner, who is accused in different Scam Cases of Animal Husbandry Department (commonly known as 'Fodder Scam Cases'), having preferred these writ petitions and having raised common question, all the three writ petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
W.P. (Cr.) No. 74 of 2005
In this case, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 8th February, 2005, passed by the learned Special Judge, C.B.I, Ranchi, in R. C. 5 (A) of 2000, whereby, the learned Court below while rejecting the prayer, made on behalf of the petitioner to issue summons under S.319 (sic) of the Code of Criminal Procedure on certain witness also rejected the prayer of the petitioner to record statements of the accused persons under S.313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure along