Back
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Name of Judge, J
State of Jharkhand and Others v. Steel Authority of India Limited Ranchi and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity and terms related to lease agreements. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural expectations for the state regarding lease renewals. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's interpretation of statutory compliance impacts on operational permissions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. conclusions about lawful administrative processes regarding mining activities. (Para 8) |
1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred against the order dated 13.11.2014, passed in writ petition being W.P.(C) No.5368 of 2014 whereby, the learned single Judge quashed an order dated 04.09.2014 passed by this appellant - State. By this order dated 04.09.2014, State of Jharkhand had directed respondent to stop mining activities. While quashing an order dated 04.09.2014, learned Single Judge has directed the State of Jharkhand to take a decision under S.8(3) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act, 1957" for the sake of brevity).
2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant - State has submitted that initially the lease was granted on 22.02.1949 for 30 years, which expired in the year 1979. An application for extension of the first lease was preferred and the same was gra
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
