1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Plaintiff in Title suit No. 3 of 1999 instituted in the Court of Sub-Judge - Ist, Dhanbad is the petitioner herein. Respondent - B.C.C.L. and its official were impleaded as principal defendants while other parties being the brothers of the plaintiffs were impleaded as pro forma respondents. Plaintiff sought a decree as against the defendant Nos. 1 to 3 declaring that Schedule - 'A' and 'B' premises are not public premises and have not vested with defendant No. 1 and that no proceedings in the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 can be initiated in respect of Schedule - A and B premises. As such the order passed in Eviction Case No. 29/86 is illegal, void and mala fide and not binding upon the plaintiff. He further sought a declaration restraining the defendant Nos. 1 to 2 from interfering with the plai