Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
X, J
Steel Authority of India Ltd and Others v. M/s. Tejas Construction Daltonganj and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details outlined regarding the background of the tender and the objections raised. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. the court justified the forfeiture based on the bidder's actions. (Para 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 3. the court provided a rationale for its decision regarding misrepresentation and breach. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Both the appeals have been tagged together and are being heard analogously as they involve the same issue and arise out of the judgments of learned single Judge passed on the same date 22nd April, 2014 in two writ - petitions W.P.(C) No.6213/2011 and W.P.(C) No.6255/2011 of the same writ - petitioner. The dates of tender notices were also same. Facts of both the writ petitions are common, but for convenience sake, relevant material facts as borne from the writ petition W.P.(C) No.6213/2011 are being noticed hereunder.
3. The legal issue posed for answer in both the appeals is whether the action of the employer / respondent - Steel Authority of India Limited / appellants herein in forfeiting the earnest money of the petitioner was proper in the eyes of law or not. Learned Single Judge was of the view that since the petitioner wit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
