SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 4196

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
ABHISHEK MAHTO (JUVENILE) REPRESENTED THROUGH HIS MOTHER SONALI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 1124 of 2025 Juvenile ‘X’ through his mother ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party --------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. R.N. Chatterjee, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, A.P.P.

------

05/ 09.12.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. This criminal revision has been preferred against the judgment dated 08.10.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-Ist -cum-Special Judge, Bokaro in Criminal Appeal No. 210/2025 whereby the learned court has been pleased to dismiss the appeal affirming order dated 19.08.2025 passed by the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Bokaro in connection with Pindrajora P.S. Case No. 104/2025 registered under sections 103(1), 3(5) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned Juvenile Justice Board, Bokaro.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was aged about 14 years at the time of alleged crime and filed the present revision application through his mother. He submits that the mother is ready to g

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top