SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 4219

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
DIPTI SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
GUNJAN SHARMA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 233 of 2023 ----

Dipti Sharma… … Appellant Versus Gunjan Sharma … … Respondent -------

CORAM :HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------

For the Appellant : Ms. Oishi Das, Advocate For the Respondent : ..

--------

Order No. 18 : Dated 8th December, 2025

1. At the outset, reference has been made to order dated 24.11.2025 in particular paragraph 8, which requires modification wherein in second line in between the phrase of words ‘that there is ...” and ‘monitoring either by the Assistant Registrar or the Deputy Registrar’, the word ‘no’ is left out inadvertently due to typing mistake.

2. We have perused order dated 24.11.2025 in entirety. The spirit of the order is that there is no monitoring either by the Assistant Registrar or the Deputy Registrar being the in- charge of the concerned Section and that is the reason in paragraph 9 of the said order explanation has been sought from the Assistant Registrar and the Deputy Registrar of the concerned Section.

3. Considering the aforesaid inadvertence, the paragraph 8 of order dated 24.11.2025 is modified to the extent that in between the phrase of words ‘th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top