SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 4228

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
JAIKISHAN TAMERA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Jaikishan Tamera Petitioner -Versus-

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Ajay Kumar Agarwal @ Ajay Kumar Agrawal … Opposite Parties -----

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI -----

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P.

For O.P. No.2 : Mrs. Rakhi Rani, Advocate -----

04/08.12.2025 I.A. No.10813 of 2025 I.A. No.10813 of 2025 has been filed for condonation of delay of 221 days in filing the present criminal revision petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the matter is arising under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. He further submits that the petitioner has been convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and he has been sentenced to undergo S.I. for one year along with compensation amount of 5,50,000/- by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Lohardaga in Complaint Case No.96/2020, T.R. No.549/2023 vide judgment dated 18.07.2023. He further submits that the said judgment has been challenged by the petitioner by filing Criminal Appeal No.94/2023 before the learned first appellate court, which has been dismissed by the learned Additional Sessi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top