SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 4325

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
SHAMIM SEIKH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

------

[Against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 29.01.2003 and 04.02.2003 respectively passed by learned 1st Additional

Sessions Judge, Bokaro in S.T. No.205 of 2001]

------

Shamim Seikh, son of Akhbar Seikh, resident of Sultan Nagar,

Chas, P.S.-Chas, Dist. Bokaro .... .... …. Appellant

Versus

The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Respondent

------

For the Appellants : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate

Ms. Trishna Sagar, Advocate

For the State : Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P.

------

PRESENT

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

JUDGEMENT appellant has been held guilty for the offences under Sections 395/412 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo R.I. of life for the offence under Section 412 of IPC and no separate sentence has been imposed upon the present appellant for the offence under section 395 of IPC.

------

CAV On 19/11/2025 Pronounced On: 23 /12/2025

Per- Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.

1. Heard Mr. A.K. Sahani, learned senior counsel for the

appellant and learned Spl.P.P. for the State.

2. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order

of conviction and sentence dated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top