HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
BHARDUL MAHTO And ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
Cr.A(DB) 903 / 2003
##PAGE1##
2025:JHHC:38670-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Appeal (DB) No.903 of 2003
[Against the judgment of order of conviction dated 10.06.2003 and
sentence dated 16.06.2003, passed by learned IVth Additional Sessions
Judge-Palamu, Daltonganj in Sessions Trial No.191 of 2000]
-----
1. Bhardul Mahto Son of Bahadur Mahto.
2. Chhatu Mahto Son of Bahadur Mahto.
3. Bahadur Mahto Son of Late Pachu Mahto
All are residents of village- Goradih, Police Station- Lesliganj,
District—Palamau. .... …. Appellants
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ..... .... Respondent
With
Criminal Appeal (DB) No.1017 of 2003
------
1. Chakarbarty Mahto son of Late Pachhu Mahto.
2. Kameshwari Mahto son of Ramji Mahto.
3. Ramji Mahto son of Late Pachu Mahto.
All are residents of village- Goradih, Police Station- Lesliganj,
District—Palamau. .... …. Appellants
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ..... .... Respondent
------
For the Appellant : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate.
For the Respt-State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, S.P.P.
Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra A.P.P.
For the Informant : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sahay, Advocate.
PRESENT
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-----
JUDGMENT
C.A.V. On:-17th November, 2025 Pronounced on:-23 /12/2025
Per:- Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.
1. Above captioned appeals are arising out of common judgment,
hence taken together for hearing.
1
##PAGE2##2025:JHHC:38670-DB
2. We have already heard Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for
the appellants as well as Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Special Public
Prosecutor assisted by Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Sahay appearing for the
informant.
3. Instant criminal appeals are directed against the judgment of
conviction dated 10.06.2003 and sentence dated 16.06.2003 passed
by learned IVth Additional Sessions Judge-Palamu, Daltonganj in
Sessions Trial No.191 of 2000, whereby the whereunder, the
appellants have been held guilty for the offences under Sections
364, 302/34, 201 of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo
imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 302/34 of the
I.P.C.; R.I. for 07 years under Section 201 of the I.P.C. and no
separate sentence has awarded for the offence under Section 364 of
the I.P.C. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
Factual Matrix
4. Factual matrix giving rise to these appeals as per fardbeyan of the
informant namely Chandradeep Mahto recorded on 21.12.1999 at
06:15 PM by S.I. Ramjee Prasad of Lesliganj, Police Station at
Goradih Tolli is that there was land dispute between father of the
informant and the accused persons namely Bhardul Mahto, Chhatu
Mahto, Bahadur Mahto, Chakarbarty Mahto, Kameshwari Mahto,
Gopal Mahto and Ramji Mahto etc. It is alleged that about 10 days
prior to occurrence Gopal Mahto had threatened the informant party
to vacate the disputed land otherwise be ready for dire
consequences. It is further alleged that on 18.12.1999 at 06:00 PM
2
##PAGE3##2025:JHHC:38670-DB
when the informant along with his father and other family members
were sitting in his house meanwhile above named accused persons
approached there and in pretext of a meeting convened near the
forest well to settle the land dispute between the parties, took away
the father of the informant with them, but till late night informant's
father did not return home then, suspicion crept into the mind of the
informant, hence he went to the forest area, but no meeting was
going on there. Thereafter, informant went to the house of the above
accused persons, but they were also not found hence, in the next day
morning, informant again went to the house of accused persons and
asked for his father, but they expressed no knowledge as to what
happened to his father and also threatened not to lodge any case at
police station. Therefore, informant started searching his father in the
village as well as his close relatives, but did not found any trace of
his father. The informant has suspected that his father has been
abducted with intention to commit murder.
5. On the basis of above fardbeyan, Lesliganj, P.S. Case No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.