HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
KISHOR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
Cr.M.P. 461 / 2024
##PAGE1##
( 2025:JHHC:38705 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.461 of 2024
------
Kishore Sharma, son of Narayan Rana @ Narayan Sharma, aged
about 38 years, resident of village-Buchitand, Ward No.01, P.O.-
Bagro, P.S.-Koderma and District-Koderma.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Diwakar Jha, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl. P.P.
------
P R E S E N T
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
By the Court:- Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the
jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure with the prayer to quash the orders dated 21.01.2012,
10.07.2012, 12.03.2013, 11.07.2013 and 25.06.2014 passed by the learned
Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in Complaint Case No.260 of 2010.
3. The brief fact of the case is that consequent upon the petitioner-
who is the accused person of the case concerned, involving the offence
punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and under
Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code not appearing before the learned
trial court; the learned trial court vide orders dated 21.01.2012 and
10.07.2012 has twice issued the non-bailable warrant of arrest against
the petitioner, without recording its satisfaction that the petitioner is
1
Cr. M.P. No.461 of 2024
##PAGE2##( 2025:JHHC:38705 )
evading his arrest and vide order dated 12.03.2013 issued proclamation
under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. against the petitioner without recording any
satisfaction that the petitioner is absconding or concealing himself to
evade his arrest and without fixing the time and place for appearance of
the petitioner and without receipt of the execution report of the non-
bailable warrant of arrest issued against him. Further, vide order dated
10.07.2013/ 11.07.2013, without the report of the written proclamation
under Section 82 of Cr.P.C., the learned Judicial Magistrate, Koderma
has directed for issuance of process for attachment of property under
Section 83 of Cr.P.C. against the petitioner and lastly vide order dated
25.06.2014, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Koderma has issued
permanent warrant of arrest against the petitioner and declared him
absconder.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said orders
dated 21.01.2012 and 10.07.2012 by which non-bailable warrant of arrest
has been issued against the petitioner is not in accordance with law and
the learned Judicial Magistrate, Koderma has failed to record any
satisfaction that the petitioner is evading his arrest. It is next submitted
that the order dated 12.03.2013 passed by the learned Judicial
Magistrate, Koderma in Complaint Case No.260 of 2010 is not
sustainable in law because the same has been issued without following
the due process of law and without recording the satisfaction that the
petitioner is absconding or concealing himself to evade his arrest and
that too without fixing any time and place for appearance of the
2
Cr. M.P. No.461 of 2024
##PAGE3##( 2025:JHHC:38705 )
petitioner. Further, the said order was passed in absence of the
execution report of the non-bailable warrant of arrest issued against the
petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that similarly, the
order dated 10.07.2013/11.07.2013 is also not sustainable in law as the
same has been passed without the report showing that the proclamation
under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. has been made.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far as the order
dated 25.06.2014 is concerned, though it is the condition precedent for
declaring a person absconder and issuing permanent warrant of arrest
is that, it must be proved before the court concerned, that the accused
has absconded and there is no immediate prospect of arresting him but
in this case, there being no material in the record to suggest that there is
no immediate prospect for arresting the petitioner, the learned Judicial
Magistrate committed a grave illegality in declaring him absconder and
issued perm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.