HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
TAHURUDDIN ALIAS TAHURUDDIN ANSARI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
Cr.M.P. 1176 / 2024
##PAGE1##
( 2 0 2 5 : J H H C :3 8 6 8 6 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 1176 of 2024
1. Tahuruddin @ Tahuruddin Ansari @ Taharuddin, aged about 51
years, son of late Sk. Yusuf
2. Buddin @ Budhin Ansari @ Kutabuddin @ Kutabuddin Sheikh,
aged about 41 years, son of late Sk. Yusuf
3. Sekh Kamaruddin, aged about 50 years, son of late Shekh Yusuf
All 1 to 3 are resident of Village-Gudri, P.O.-Ichagarh, P.S.-
Ichagarh, Dist.-Seraikella-Kharsawan
.... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Shekh Abdul Latif, aged about 72 years, son of late Sk. Shamsuddin,
resident of Gudri Bara Amra, P.O.-Ichagarh, P.S.-Ichagarh, Dist.-
Seraikella-Kharsawan
…. Opp. Parties
P R E S E N T
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
…..
For the Petitioners : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl. P.P.
For O.P. No.2 : None
…..
By the Court:-
1. Heard the parties.
2. Though notice has been validly served upon the opposite party
no.2 yet no one turns up on behalf of the opposite party no.2 in-
spite of repeated calls.
3. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the
jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. with the
prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding including the
order dated 20.03.2023 passed by the learned Additional Chief
1
Cr.M.P. No.1176 of 2024
##PAGE2##( 2 0 2 5 : J H H C :3 8 6 8 6 )
Judicial Magistrate, Chandil in connection with C.C. Case No. 435
of 2019 whereby and where under, the learned Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Chandil has found prima facie case for the
offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 323, 504, 506, 120B, 34
of the Indian Penal Code.
4. The allegation against the petitioners is that petitioners in
connivance with their mother sold the property without partition
of the property; in which share is claimed by the complainant.
5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the
allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is next submitted
by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there is no
allegation against the petitioners of being entrusted with any
property and in the absence of the same, the question of dishonest
misappropriation of the property does not arise and in the
absence of the same, the offence punishable under Section 406 of
the Indian Penal Code is not made out. It is then submitted by the
learned counsel for the petitioners that there is no allegation
against the petitioners of deceiving anybody or inducing any
person deceived to part with any property hence, the offence
punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code is not
made out. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioners that there is absolutely no allegation against the
petitioners of causing hurt to anybody and in the absence of the
same, the offence punishable under Section 323 of the Indian
Penal Code is not made out. It is further submitted by the learned
2
Cr.M.P. No.1176 of 2024
##PAGE3##( 2 0 2 5 : J H H C :3 8 6 8 6 )
counsel for the petitioners that there is no allegation against the
petitioners of intentionally insulting anybody or committing
criminal intimidation and in the absence of the same, the offence
punishable under Sections 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code is
also not made out. It is lastly submitted by the learned counsel for
the petitioners that as none of the offences in respect of which
prima facie case has been found by the learned A.C.J.M., Chandil is
made out against the petitioner, either in furtherance of common
intention with the co-accused persons or in criminal conspiracy
with them therefore, continuation of the criminal proceeding will
amount to abuse of process of law. Hence, it is submitted that the
prayer as made in this criminal miscellaneous petition be allowed.
6. The learned Addl. P.P. on the other hand vehemently opposes
the prayer and submits that the materials in the record are
sufficient to constitute each of the offences in respect of which
prima facie case is found by the learned Additional Chief Judicial
Magi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.