HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
MAHADEV YADAV – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
Cr.M.P. 754 / 2021
##PAGE1##
[2025:JHHC:38691]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.754 of 2021
------
1. Mahadev Yadav, aged about 66 years, Son of Late Dilo
Yadav.
2. Santosh Yadav, aged about 40 years, Son of Mahadeo
Yadav.
3. Kapildeo Yadav, aged about 35 years, Son of Mahadeo
Yadav
All are R/o Sri Nagar, P.O.- Barsot, P.S.- Barhi, District-
Hazaribagh.
… Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The S.D.M., Barhi, P.O., P.S. – Barhi, District Hazaribagh
3. Munni Devi, W/o Indra Vishwakarma, R/o Village – Barhi
(Lohartoli), Dhanbad Road, P.O., P.S.- Barhi, District-
Hazaribagh.
4. Chandan Kumar Vishwakarma, S/o Indra Vishwakarma,
R/o Village – Barhi (Lohartoli), Dhanbad Road, P.O., P.S.-
Barhi, District- Hazaribagh.
5. Kundan Kumar Vishwakarma, S/o Indra Vishwakarma,
R/o Village – Barhi (Lohartoli), Dhanbad Road, P.O., P.S.-
Barhi, District- Hazaribagh.
… Opposite Parties
------
1
Cr. M.P. No.754 of 2021
##PAGE2##[2025:JHHC:38691]
For the Petitioners : Ms. Aprajita Bhardwaj, Advocate
Ms. Khushi Mahendru, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P.
For the O.P. No.3 to 5 : Mr. Nilendu Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Binod Singh, Advocate
Mr. Kumar Vishwambhar, Adv.
------
P R E S E N T
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
By the Court:- Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking
the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure with the prayer to quash the order dated
08.02.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III,
Hazaribagh in Criminal Revision No. 67 of 2020 whereby and where
under the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Hazaribagh found
no illegality in the order dated 23.11.2020 passed by the learned Sub-
Divisional Magistrate, Barhi in Misc. Case No. 01 of 2020 by which the
learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Barhi directed that with the help
of the Administration, arrangement shall be made for the members of
the first party namely Munni Devi and her two children to reside in
the disputed house.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it is the
admitted case of the parties that the members of the first party were
dispossessed from the disputed house on 12.10.2020. They
approached the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Barhi on 13.10.2020. The
police report was obtained on 13.10.2020. So, as on the date of
2
Cr. M.P. No.754 of 2021
##PAGE3##[2025:JHHC:38691]
approaching the court and initiation of proceeding under Section 145
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, admittedly, the members of the
first party were not in possession of the disputed property; in exercise
of the power under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
they ought not to have been put in possession of the said house in
exercise of the power by the Executive Magistrate. It is next submitted
that in para-11 of the impugned judgment, the learned Additional
Sessions Judge-III, Hazaribagh has misinterpreted the first proviso of
Section 145(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure by committing an
error apparent on the record by omitting the word “Next” between
the two words “two months” and ‘before’ appearing in the first
proviso of Section 145(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Hence, it
is submitted that the prayer as prayed for in this Criminal
Miscellaneous Petition be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and the
learned counsel for the opposite party No.3 to 5 on the other hand
submit that even if a person is not in possession of the disputed
property on the date of preliminary order, still he can be put in
possession over the disputed property by the Executive Magistrate in
exercise of its power under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure. Hence, it is submitted that no illegality has been
committed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Hazaribagh
in passing the said order dated 08.02.2021 in Criminal Revision No. 67
of 2020. It is lastly submitted that this Criminal Miscellaneous
Petition, being without any merit, be dismissed.
3
Cr. M.P. No.754 of 2021
##PAGE4##[2025:JHHC:38691]
5. Having hea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.