HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
KRISHAN KUMAR PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
Cr.M.P. 2441 / 2020
##PAGE1##
( 2025:JHHC:38530 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.2441 of 2020
------
Krishna Kumar Prasad son of Ram Kumar Prasad, aged about 75
years, resident of Flat No.204-A, Ramnik Apartment, Judged Colony,
R.P.S. More, Danapur, P.O., P.S. and District-Patna.
… Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Pushpam Lata Prasad wife of Sanjay Kumar, Resident of M/10
Phase-2 above the shop, Prem Chandra Nagar Colony, P.O.
Pandeipur, District- Varanasi.
… Opposite Parties
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vibhor Mayank, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA-III
: Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy, AC to GA-III
For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate
------
P R E S E N T
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
By the Court:- Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the
jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 with the prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding
as well as the order taking cognizance dated 20.06.2019 passed in
Complaint Case No.1596 of 2016 by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st
Class, Ranchi whereby and whereunder the learned Judicial Magistrate-
1st Class, Ranchi has found prima facie case for the offences punishable
under Sections 418, 467, 468 and 34 of the Indian Pena Code.
1
Cr. M.P. No.2441 of 2020
##PAGE2##( 2025:JHHC:38530 )
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation
against the petitioner is that the petitioner knowing that the property is a
joint property and knowing pretty well that a partition suit was going on
between the petitioner and his coparceners has sold the joint property to
the co-accused Dr. Shambhu Prasad Singh, who purchased the joint
property.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that the allegation
against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that even though the
entire allegation made against the petitioner in the complaint, statement
on solemn affirmation and the statement of the enquiry witnesses are
considered to be true in their entirety still neither the offence punishable
under Section 418 nor the offence punishable under Section 467, 468 of
the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioner, even with the
aid of Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is next submitted that this
Court has already quashed the entire criminal proceeding against the co-
accused person Dr. Shambhu Prasad Singh by the judgement dated
07.08.2025 in Cr.M.P. No.2997 of 2019. Hence, it is submitted that the
prayer, as prayed for in the instant Cr.M.P., be allowed.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel
for the opposite party No.2 on the other hand vehemently oppose the
prayer of the petitioner made in the instant Cr.M.P. and submit that if the
allegations made against the petitioner are considered to be true in their
entirety, then all the offences i.e., the offence punishable under Section
418, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code with the aid of Section 34 of the
2
Cr. M.P. No.2441 of 2020
##PAGE3##( 2025:JHHC:38530 )
Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioner. Hence, it is
submitted that this Cr.M.P., being without any merit, be dismissed.
6. Having heard the rival submissions made at the Bar and after
carefully going through the materials available in the record, it is
pertinent to mention here that so far as the offence punishable under
Section 418 of the Indian Penal Code is concerned, the essential
ingredient to constitute the said offence are as under:-
(1) The accused cheated a person;
(2) At the time of offence accused was bound by law or
legal contract to protect the interests of the person
whom he cheated;
(3) The obligation related to the transaction involving the
cheating;
(4) The accused had the knowledge that his act was likely
to cause wrongful loss to the person; whose interest he
was bound to protect.
7. Thus, it is pertinent to mention here that to constitute the offence
of cheating, the essential ingredients are:-
(i) Deception of a person either by making a fals
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.