HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
SANDEEP KUMAR ALIAS SANDIP THAKUR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
Cr.M.P. 2769 / 2025
##PAGE1##
(2025:JHHC:38474)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.2769 of 2025
------
Sandeep Kumar @ Sandip Thakur, aged about 25 years, son of
Madho Sharma @ Madhow Thakur, resident of Barsot, P.O. & P.S.
Barhi, Dist. Hazaribagh …
Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Sarita Devi, w/o Late Rameshwar Karmali, r/o Village
Ranchichunwa, P.O. Padariya P.S. Barhi, Distl Hazaribagh
… Opposite Parties
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P.
For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate
Ms. Neelam Kumari, Advocate
------
P R E S E N T
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
By the Court:- Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the
jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik
Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the prayer to quash the First Information
Report of Barhi P.S. Case No.244 of 2022 registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code
and Section 3 (1) (s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the said case is now pending in
the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Judge,
SC/ST Hazaribagh.
1
Cr. M.P. No.2769 of 2025
##PAGE2##(2025:JHHC:38474)
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the investigation
of the case is still going on and charge-sheet has not yet been submitted
in this case.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the
informant/opposite party No.2 jointly draw the attention of this Court
towards Interlocutory Application No.12338 of 2025 which is supported
by the separate affidavits of the brother and Pairvikar of the petitioner as
well as the informant/opposite party No.2 of this case and submit that
therein it has categorically been mentioned that informant and the
alleged victim have compromised the matter and the alleged victim, out
of her own sweet will, left her house out of anger because of a quarrel
with her mother. It is next jointly submitted that the alleged victim has
solemnized marriage with the petitioner with the consent of her mother
and in view of the same, the informant does not want to prosecute the
petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute
between the parties is basically a private dispute having a civil flavour
and no public policy is involved in this case. Learned counsel for the
petitioner next submits that in view of the compromise between the
parties, the continuation of this criminal proceeding will amount to
abuse of process of law as in view of the compromise, the chance of
conviction of the petitioner is remote and bleak. Hence, it is submitted
that the First Information Report of Barhi P.S. Case No.244 of 2022
which is now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions
Judge-VI-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Hazaribagh, be quashed and set
aside.
2
Cr. M.P. No.2769 of 2025
##PAGE3##(2025:JHHC:38474)
5. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State submits that in view
of the compromise between the parties, the State has no objection for
quashing and setting aside the First Information Report of Barhi P.S.
Case No.244 of 2022 which is now pending in the court of learned
Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Hazaribagh.
6. Having heard the rival submissions made at the Bar and after
carefully going through the materials available in the record, it is
pertinent to mention here that the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in
the case of Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur &
Others vs. State of Gujarat & Another reported in (2017) 9 SCC 641,
had the occasion to consider the jurisdiction of the High Court under
Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure inter alia on the basis of
compromise between the parties and has held in paragraph No.11 as
under:-
“11. Section 482 is prefaced with an overriding provision. The
statute saves the inherent power of the High Court, as a superior
court, to make such orders as are necessary
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.