SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 4417

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
KINKARI PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI

Cr. Revision No. 1138 of 2025

1.Kinkari Pandey

2.Pappu Pandey @ Pappu Kumar Pandey .... Petitioner(s)

-- Versus --

1.The State of Jharkhand

2.Union of India …… ….. .... Opp. Party

----

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

---

For the Petitioner(s) :- Mr. N.P.Thakur, Advocate

For the State :- Mr. Satish Prasad, Advocate

For the Railways :- Mr. Prashant Pallava, Advocate

----

5/16.12.2025 I.A. No.15567 of 2025 has been filed for condonation of delay of 13

days.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in preparation of filing of the revision petition this delay has occurred and in view of that the

delay may kindly be condoned.

3. Learned counsel for the Railways has got no objection if the delay is

condoned.

4. In view of above such delay in filing the instant revision petition is

hereby condoned and the instant petition is allowed and disposed of.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this revision petition is preferred against the judgment dated 25.6.2025 passed in Cr.Appeal No.130 of 2022 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge XVI, Dhanbad, whereby he has affirmed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence of the learned Judic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top