SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 4467

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
PURAN KUMAR MAHATO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr.M.P. No. 503 of 2023

1. Puran Kumar Mahato, aged about 44 years, S/o Late Badri Mahato,

resident of Brirajpur, P.O. –Kharkhari, P.s. –Madhuban, District –

Dhanbad, Jharkhand.

2. Namita Kumari, aged about 23 years, D/o Ruplal Saw, W/o Ranjan

Mahato, resident of Birajpur, P.O. –Kharkhari, P.S. –Madhuban,

District –Dhanbad, Jharkhand.

3. Raju Saw, aged about 45 years, son of Bhajan Teli, R/o Ramnagar

Garh, P.O. Ramnagar Garh, P.S. –Maduda, District –Dhanbad,

Jharkhand.

.... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Nehal Chandra Mahato, son of Late Tulu Mahato, resident of

Telmacchho, P.O. –Ramnagargarh, P.S. –Mahuda, District –

Dhanbad, Jharkhand. …. Opp. Parties

P R E S E N T

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

…..

For the Petitioners : Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate

: Ms. Priya Saw, Advocate

For the State : Mr. V.K. Vashistha, Spl. P.P.

For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate

: Mr. Sanket Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocate

…..

By the Court:-

1. Heard the parties.

2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the

jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the prayer to quash the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top