SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 200

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
SMT MEERA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
Cr.M.P. 3150 / 2023



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 3134 of 2023

1. Mrs. Neelima Singh @ Neelima Kumari, aged about

40 years, daughter of late Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh

2. Miss Madhuri Kumar, aged about 30 years, daughter of Late Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh

3. Mrs. Soni Kumar, aged about 42 years, daughter of Late Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh All residents of House No. 297/B3, Basant Vihar, Kanke Road, P.O. Kanke, P.S. Gonda, District -

Ranchi, PIN Code-834001. ...... Petitioners Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Nihit Garodia, son of Shri Shravan Kumar Garodia, resident of 5/1, Vasant Vihar, P.O. Kanke, P.S. -

Gonda, District-Ranchi, PIN Code-834001.

.….. Opposite Parties With Cr.M.P. No. 3150 of 2023 Mrs. Meera Singh, aged about 67 years, wife of late Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh, resident of House No. 297/B3 Basant Vihar, Kanke Road, P.O. Kanke, P.S. -

Gonda, District-Ranchi, PIN Code -834001.

...... Petitioners Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Nihit Garodia, son of Shri Shravan Kumar Garodia, resident of 5/1, Vasant Vihar, P.O. Kanke, P.S.

Gonda, District Ranchi, PIN Code - 834001.

.….. Opposite Parties For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K.Kashyap, Sr. Adv.

Ms. Supriya Dayal, Adv.

For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashishta, Spl.PP Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.PP For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Shailesh Poddar , Adv. ( In CrMP. 3150 of 2023)

P R E S E N T HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY By the Court:- Heard the parties. No one turns up on behalf of the Opp. Party no. 2 in CrMP No. 3134 of 2023 in spite of repeated calls, though Opp. Party no. 2 in Cr.M.P. no. 3150 of

2023 appeared through a lawyer.

2. Since both these criminal miscellaneous petitions have been filed with the selfsame common prayer and have arisen from the common P.S. case no. being Gonda P.S. case no. 98 of 2023, hence, both these Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment.

3. These Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of CrPC with the prayer for quashing and setting aside the entire criminal proceeding in connection with Gonda P.S. case no. 98 of 2023 including the order dated 24.06.2024 passed by learned JMFC, XXI, Ranchi whereby and whereunder, the learned Magistrate, has taken cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections

406, 420, 120B of the IPC.

4. The brief fact of the case is that all the three petitioners of CrMP No. 3134 of 2023 are the daughters and the sole petitioner of CrMP no. 3150 of 2023 is the wife of Late Jitendra Kumar Singh and the allegation against them is that during his life time, Jitendra Kumar Singh took ₹ 52 lakhs as advance by entering into an agreement with the informant to construct a multi-storied building in the year 2012 but Jitendra Kumar Singh died in the year 2016 and after his death, his family members, who have been arrayed as accused persons, assured the informant that they will honour the agreement entered into by Late Jitendra Kumar Singh and a fresh agreement was entered into between the informant and the sole petitioner of CrMP No. 3150 of 2023 by the said the sole petitioner further taking Rs. 10 lakhs by deceit and fraudulent means but the petitioners have not made available the said land but got the said land mutated in the name of the sole petitioner of CrMP no. 3150 of 2023. On the basis of the written report submitted by the informant, the police registered Gonda P.S. case no. 98 of 2023 and took up the investigation of the case and after completion of the investigation, the police submitted charge-sheet against the petitioners for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120B of the IPC and on the basis of the same learned JMFC, XXI, Ranchi has taken cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120B of the IPC.

5. It is submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners that the allegations against the petitioners are false and the petitioners are ladies and the petitioners were not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top