SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 16

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
Mr. Aparesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, JJ
Sonu Behera @ Tiblu Behera @ Tiblu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 725 of 2014



Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr. Arun Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Gouri Shanker Prasad, A.P.P.

A killing in the heat of passion during a sudden quarrel may reduce culpability from murder to manslaughter under Exception-4 of IPC.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 304 - Conviction for murder - Appellant charged under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife - Court held that evidence indicated a sudden quarrel without premeditation, allowing benefit of Exception-4 under Section 300 IPC, modifying the conviction to Section 304 Part-II IPC with a reduced sentence of 10 years. (Paras 17)

(B) Legal principle - Intent to kill requires a proximate connection between action and intent; a killing in the heat of passion after a sudden quarrel may invoke lesser culpability. (Paras 16-17)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted for the murder of his wife following an incident where he chased and killed her during an argument. The prosecution relied on multiple witnesses to establish the act and the weapon used was corroborated by forensic evidence. The history of domestic strife was pivotal to the alleged motive.

Findings of Court:
The trial court's conviction was deemed based on proper appreciation of evidence; however, it mischaracterized the nature of the offence.

Issues: The key question was whether the act constituted murder or manslaughter in light of the circumstances surrounding the incident.

Ratio Decidendi: The appellate court found that the act was not premeditated and occurred in the heat of passion, constituting manslaughter.

Result: The conviction was modified from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part-II IPC with a sentence of 10 years.

Table of Content
1. facts surrounding the murder of the appellant's wife. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments questioning the admissibility of evidence and intent. (Para 7 , 8 , 10)
3. court observations on the sufficiency of evidence. (Para 9 , 11 , 12)
4. court ruling on the nature of the offence and applicable provisions. (Para 16)
5. modification of conviction and sentence imposed. (Para 17)

By Court: Heard learned counsel Mr. Arun Kumar representing the appellant as a panel lawyer of JHALSA and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Gouri Shankar Prasad.

2. This appellant is undergoing rigorous imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default whereof to suffer three months simple imprisonment upon his conviction for the offence under Section 302 of the I.P.C. for the murder of his wife namely Shanti Behara rendered by the learned court of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Ghatsila in Session Case No.94 of 2013 vide impugned judgment of conviction dated 14th July 2014 and the order of sentence dated 16th July 2014. Informant is a Chowkidar no.1/7 Uttam Karamkar of village Meria, P.S. Musabani, District East Singhbhum upon whose Fardbeyan recorded by Sub-Inspector A.K. Dubey, Officer-in-charge, Musabani Police Station at 12.30 hours on 18th July 2012 at Quarter No. SPR 7/9 Harijan Basti, P.S. Musabani, the F.I.R. was lodged bearing Musabani P.S. Case No.35/2012 under of the Indian Penal Code on 18th July 2012 at 15 hours against the sole accused/appellant herein. The informant has interalia made the following allegations in his Fardbeyan:

On 18th July 2012 he was on deputation in law and order duty in Musabani market when he got information at 12:00 hours that one person in Harijan Basti has killed his wife by an assault with Kulhari and brought the dead body into his quarter. In order to verify this information, he reached there and found a crowd assembled. On being asked, the villagers informed that accused Sonu Behera @ Tiblu Behera son of Late Monu Behara, Quarter No.SPR 7/9 Harijan Basti of Musabani Police Station has been living with his wife Shanti Behara aged 40 years for five years. Both of them were engaged in manual labour. On that day at around quarter to 12:00 they had returned to their quarter from their work. Accused Sonu Behera aged 45 years demanded money from his wife for drinking liquor. This resulted in heated exchanges between the two whereupon the accused Sonu Behera with a Kulhari in his hand chased his wife Shanti Behara in order to kill her. She ran and on reaching in front of the house of Sushila Mukhi (P.W.8) sat on a bench. Accused Sonu Behera @ Tiblu followed her to that place and assaulted with the Kulhari upon her neck which resulted in injuries and she died at the same place. Thereafter, he picked up the body of his wife and brought it to the Quarter No.SPR 7/9 and went out of his house with the Kulhari. The blood stained Kulhari was seized from the accused Sonu Behera @ Tiblu Behera with the help of the villagers. He narrated the incidence to the Officer-in- charge, Musabani Police Station and the incidence was confirmed by the other villagers namely Sushila Mukhi, Munna Sona, Lal Mohan Karua, etc. The informant asserted that the accused Sonu Behera @ Tiblu Behera aged 45 years son of Late Monu Behara of Quarter No.7/9 Harijan Basti, P.S. Musabani, District East Singhbhum has with an intention to commit murder of his wife assaulted on her neck and caused her death and then brought the dead body to his house.

3. Investigation commenced upon institution of F.I.R. and after finding the case true, chargesheet bearing no.47/2012 dated 31st July 2012 was submitted under Section 302 I.P.C. against the sole accused. Cognizance was taken by the learned court on 22.09.2012. The case was committed thereafter to the court of sessions on 05.01.2013. Charges were framed under I.P.C. against the sole accused on 21st May 2013 by the learned court of District and Additional Sessions Judge-II, Ghatsila. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top