Back
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
MR. ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J
Laljee Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bigu Singh, Simanya Devi, Deputy Commissioner, Palamau – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the evaluation of evidence must consider both document reliability and the qualifications of witnesses. (Para 2 , 3 , 14 , 16) |
| 2. establishing ownership and inheritance of property entails proving familial relationships. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. documentary evidence holds greater weight than oral testimony in establishing legal rights. (Para 10 , 15) |
| 4. the reliance on documentary evidence over oral testimony aligns with legal standards of proof. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. the appeal lacked merit and was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision. (Para 17) |
By the Court:- Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. No one turns up on behalf of the respondents in-spite of repeated calls though notices have validly been served upon the respondents. Hence, this appeal is heard ex-parte against the respondents.
3. This second appeal has been preferred under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the concurrent judgment and decree dated 19.09.2002 passed by the learned District Judge, Latehar in Title Appeal No.19 of 2001 whereby and where under, the learned first appellate court has dismissed the appeal and did not interfere with the judgment of dismissal of the suit passe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
