Back
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
MR. RATNAKER BHENGRA, J
Ayodhya Mandal – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on eyewitness accounts of the assault. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments focused on inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony and procedural issues. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 18) |
| 3. judicial observations on the reliability of evidence provided. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. court's reasoning supporting upholding of conviction. (Para 24) |
| 5. conclusion and modification of sentence with compensation ordered. (Para 25) |
Heard Mr. Onkar Nath Tiwary, the learned counsel for the appellants and Mrs. Niki Sinha, the learned counsel for the State.
2. The present criminal appeal is preferred against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence both dated 31.03.2010, passed by the th learned 5 Additional Sessions Judge, FTC, Dumka in Sessions Case No. 236 of 2007 and Sessions Case No. 106 of 2008, whereby and whereunder, the appellants were convicted under Section 325 /34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo RI for three years each.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, as per the fardbeyan dated 08.01.2007 of the informant Nageshwar Mandal (PW-9) is that on 08.01.2007 at about 12:00 O’clock noon, informant with his wife were working as a labourer for d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
