SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 320

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
UPENDRA NATH VERMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCE DEPTT – Respondent
LPA 333 / 2023



2026:JHHC:4317-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No.333 of 2023 ------

Upendra Nath Verma, son of Late Rambali Singh, resident of C/o Janardan Tiwari, Near Kalisthan, P.O., P.S. and District Garhwa.

------- Appellant Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Human Resource Department, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Human Resource Department, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi.

3. Regional Deputy Director of Education, Medninagar, Palamau.

4. District Education Officer, Garhwa.

5. Principal, Rama Sahu Arya Vaidik Ucch Vidyalaya, Garhwa.

6. The State of Bihar, through Director, Secondary Education, H.R.D, Patna.

7. Sri Chandreshwar Prasad Singh son of Mulchandra Prasad, resident of village & P.O. Mohammadpur, P.S.

Asithawan, District Nalanda (Bihar).

------ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA -------

For the Appellant : Mr. Abhay Kr. Mishra, Adv.

For the State of Jharkhand : Mr. Aditya Raman, AC to GA-III For the State of Bihar : Ms. Diksha Dwivedi, AC to GA (Bihar)

-------

12/16.02.2026 Heard Mr. Abhay Kr. Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Aditya Raman, learned AC to GA-III and Ms. Diksha Dwivedi, learned AC to GA (Bihar).

2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 24.04.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 376 of 2013, whereby and whereunder the writ application preferred by the appellant against his order of termination as contained in Memo No. 927 dated 01.11.2012 has been dismissed.

3. The factual aspects of the case reveal that the writ petitioner, pursuant to an advertisement dated 27.11.1987 applied for the post of Assistant Teacher and being successful he was appointed on the said post and was posted at General High School, Rosma, Purnia vide Memo No. 1260-1298 dated 10.04.1988. Due to some personal reasons the writ petitioner did not give his joining in the said school and instead requested for a transfer which was accepted and vide Memo No. 511-5 dated 16.08.1989 the petitioner was transferred from General High School, Rosma, Purnia to Rama Sahu Arya Vaidya Ucch Vidyalaya, Garhwa, Palamu. The petitioner had, accordingly, submitted his joining which was accepted and the Principal of the said school had informed the District Education Officer of the same vide letter dated 05.09.1989. It has been urged by the petitioner that a letter was issued in the year 2003 for submitting the entire documents to the Principal, Rama Sahu Arya Vaidya Ucch Vidyalaya, Garhwa and in compliance thereof the original record as well as the service book and other testimonials with respect to the petitioner were handed over to the District Education Officer, Garhwa vide letter dated 12.06.2003. The petitioner was in receipt of a show-cause notice as contained in letter no. 353 dated 21.06.2003 issued by the District Education Officer, Garhwa wherein the petitioner was asked to submit his reply on five issues as demarcated in the show cause notice. The petitioner had duly given a reply justifying his stand on all the issues raised. After a hiatus of seven years the District Education Officer, Garhwa vide letter no. 909 dated 08.09.2010 addressed to the Principal of the school of posting of the petitioner had directed to submit all the original documents relating to the service of the petitioner for verification. The petitioner was asked to appear in person to reply to certain allegations made against him and in compliance thereof the petitioner had submitted his show- cause reply dated 08.12.2010 wherein such allegations were refuted. The petitioner was again in receipt of a letter as contained in letter no. 710 dated 17.08.2012 issued by the District Education Officer whereby the appointment of the petitioner was termed as illegal appointment. The petitioner had replied to the letter dated 17.08.2012 and the illegal appointment of the petitioner has been sought to be continued by harpi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top