HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
POWEL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY – Respondent
WPC 471 / 2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 471 of 2026
Powel Kumar & Ors. ... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ... … Respondents
-----
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioners : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Akash Ajit Kumar, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Piyush Chitresh, AC to AG
For the JSSC : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate
Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate
For the NCTE : Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Anshuman Mishra, Advocate
-----
Order No. 02 Dated: 28.01.2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The learned counsel for the respondents seek some time to file a
response. They also point that the appointments which are the
subject-matter of this petition are being monitored by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court and therefore, this Court, should not even entertain
this petition.
3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that in terms of
the impugned Rules and Advertisement, passing of Jharkhand
Teachers Eligibility Test (JTET) Examination is prescribed as an
essential qualification. However, since 2016, the State of Jharkhand
has not conducted this examination. Accordingly, the learned Senior
Counsel for the petitioners submits that the insistence of such a
requirement amounts to manifest arbitrariness and such a condition
must be struck down. In any event, he submits that the candidates,
who have cleared the corresponding examination conducted by the
1
##PAGE2##Central Government, should be held eligible.
4. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners pointed out that the
learned Single Judge of this Court, in W.P.(S) No. 5355 of 2025,
after taking cognizance of the fact that the State of Jharkhand has
not conducted the JTET Examination since 2016, directed the State
of Jharkhand not to fill-up the posts of ‘Assistant Teachers’ until the
JTET Examination is held and the results are declared. He submitted
that this direction was ultimately modified, but such modification
was based upon a misconstruction of the orders of the Hon’ble
Supreme Court.
5. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners therefore submitted that
by way of interim relief, we should stay the selection process or in
the alternate, direct the consideration of the candidatures of the
petitioners by granting suitable relaxation particularly since the
petitioners fulfill all qualifications prescribed by RCI, which is a
Central Body and the qualifications prescribed by RCI override the
qualifications prescribed by the State Government.
6. We have considered the contentions based upon which interim relief
is being pressed in this petition. However, we are satisfied that no
case is made out for the grant of interim relief in the terms applied
for.
7. Though it is true that since 2016, no JTET Examination has been
conducted by the State of Jharkhand, still, we cannot ignore the
fact that the Hon’ble Supreme Court is monitoring the recruitment
of ‘Assistant Teachers’. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has already
been apprised of this circumstance about the State of Jharkhand
2
##PAGE3##not conducting the JTET Examination since 2016. Therefore, at this
stage, to interrupt the selection process and thereby derail the
timelines set out by the Hon’ble Supreme Court will not be
appropriate, and at least we will be loath to make any such order in
this petition.
8. That apart, the learned Single Judge, by order dated 17.11.2025,
modified the earlier order dated 25.09.2025 under which a restraint
was imposed upon the State to proceed with the recruitment
process until the JTET Examination was conducted and the results
declared. The modification was to apply to 3451 posts of
Intermediate and Graduate Trained Special Education Assistant
Teachers, which are the subject matter of the present
advertisement and consequently the present petition.
9. The above order has not been challenged. By challenging the Rules
or by raising other arguments, the effect of the orders made by the
learned Single Judge cannot be prima facie diluted or use
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.