HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
AJIT KUMAR ROY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY – Respondent
WPC 4715 / 2021
##PAGE1##
(2026:JHHC:2115)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S). No. 4715 of 2021
Ajit Kumar Roy, aged about 59 years, s/o - Sukhdeo Prasad Roy, R/O
New Barganda, P.O., P.S. & District - Giridhih.… … Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of
Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. -
Dhurwa, Town and District - Ranchi, Jharkhand.
2. The Secretary, Department of Urban and Housing, Government of
Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. -
Dhurwa, Town and District - Ranchi, Jharkhand.
3. Smt. Vijhya Jadhav, W/O not known to the petitioner, presently
working and posted as Director, Municipal Administration,
Government of Jharkhand, Office situated at Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. -
Dhurwa, Town and District - Ranchi, Jharkhand.
4. Deputy Commissioner, Giridih, at P.O. & P.S. - Giridih, District -
Giridih, Jharkhand.
5. Deputy Municipal Commissione,r Giridih, at P.O. & P.S. - Giridih,
District - Giridih, Jharkhand.
6. Executive Officer, Bundu Nagar Panchayat, at P.O. & P.S. - Bundu,
District - Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Respondents
---
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Singh, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Indranil Bhaduri, SC-IV
For the Resp. No. 5 : Mr. Shadab Bin Haque, Advocate
---
th
22/28 January 2026
1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioner by filing this writ petition has challenged the order
dated 20.10.2021 contained in Memo No. 3610 issued by the
Director of Municipal Administration whereby the petitioner has
been dismissed from service and it has been ordered to recover the
salary which has been paid to the petitioner from 2nd September
1
##PAGE2##(2026:JHHC:2115)
1989 and further it was directed to institute an FIR against the
petitioner for allegedly committing criminal breach of trust,
cheating, giving false statement, tampering with service records
and also for fraudulent practice.
3. The petitioner was appointed as Sanitary Inspector in Giridih
Municipal Corporation. He joined the serviced on 02.09.1989 and a
charge-sheet was issued to the petitioner on 01.07.2021 contained
in Memo No. 1581 which has been brought on record at
Annexure - 12, Page No. 64 of the writ petition.
4. From perusal of the charge-sheet, I find that some facts have been
mentioned therein from where one has to decipher the misconduct
of the petitioner. It is made clear that the misconduct has not been
specifically spelt out in the charge-sheet. In the charge-sheet it has
been stated that the petitioner was time and again directed to
produce his certificate in relation to his educational qualification
and date of birth but the petitioner failed to produce the same. It is
alleged that a preliminary enquiry committee was constituted and
the committee found that the service book of the petitioner was
tampered. The aforesaid is the sum and substance of the
departmental charge-sheet.
5. A departmental proceeding against a government servant is
conducted as per the Jharkhand Government Servant
(Classification, Control and Appeal Rules, 2016). Rule 14 of the
aforesaid rules prescribes the punishment which can be imposed on
a government servant. Rule 14(i) to (iv) are the minor penalties and
the rests are the major penalties which can be imposed. In this case,
the punishment which has been imposed against the petitioner is a
major penalty.
6. Part VI of the aforesaid rules describes about procedure for
imposing penalties. Rule 17 deals with procedure for imposing
major penalty.
7. Rule 17(1) clearly provides that no order imposing any penalties
specified in Clause - (v) to (xi) of Rule - 14 (Major Penalties), shall
be made without holding an enquiry, as far as may be in the
2
##PAGE3##(2026:JHHC:2115)
manner provided in the rules. Further, Rule 17(3) clearly provide
that where a disciplinary enquiry is proposed to be held against a
government servant, the Disciplinary Authority will draw up or
cause to be drawn the substance of imputation of a misconduct or
misbehavior as a definite a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.