HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
TARKESHWAR TIWARY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
Cr.M.P. 1502 / 2023
##PAGE1##
(2026:JHHC:2173)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.1502 of 2023
------
Tarkeshwar Tiwary aged about 45 Years S/O Bhuvneshwar Tiwary
R/O Village- 32, Kalyanpur Baridih Basti P.O. Baridih P.S.-
Sidhgora, Town- Jamshedpur District- East Singhbhum (Jharkhand)
… Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Pratap Singh S/O Babulal R/O A-3, Suguna Colony, Birsanagar,
Zone No.8, P.O. & P.S.- Birsanagar Town- Jamshedpur District- East
Singhbhum (Jharkhand) … Opposite Parties
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl. P.P.
For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Birat Kumar, Advocate
------
P R E S E N T
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
By the Court:- Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the
jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 with the prayer to quash the order dated 02.02.2023
passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in
connection with Complaint Case No.1573 of 2022 whereby and where
under the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur has found
prima facie case for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420
of the Indian Penal Code.
1
Cr. M.P. No.1502 of 2023
##PAGE2##(2026:JHHC:2173)
3. Learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 files a counter-
affidavit.
4. Let the same be kept in the record.
5. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner had
taken three (3) shops of the complainant on rent and paid rent for some
time but he is not paying rent of the said shop since 2015.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the order of the
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Neetu Singh & Others
vs. State of U.P. passed in 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 281 and submits that
therein the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has reiterated the settled
principle of law that failure to pay rent is not a penal offence under the
Indian Penal Code. It is next submitted that the allegation against the
petitioner is false. It is further submitted that even if the entire
allegations made against the petitioner are considered to be true in their
entirety still neither the offence punishable under Section 406 nor the
offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code is made
out against the petitioner. It is also submitted that the father of the
complainant has already sold the entire shop premises to the petitioner
and thereafter the petitioner registered himself with the JUSCO and
paying taxes to JUSCO. It is further submitted that there is inordinate
and unexplained delay of at least seven (7) years in filing the complaint.
It is lastly submitted that the prayer, as prayed for in the instant
Cr.M.P., be allowed.
2
Cr. M.P. No.1502 of 2023
##PAGE3##(2026:JHHC:2173)
7. Learned Addl. P. P. appearing for the State and the learned
counsel for the opposite party No.2 on the other hand vehemently
oppose the prayer of the petitioner made in the instant Cr.M.P. and
submit that the petitioner has not yet appeared before the trial court. It
is further submitted that it is false to say that the father of the
complainant has sold the property to the petitioner. Hence, it is
submitted that this Cr.M.P., being without any merit, be dismissed.
8. Having heard the rival submissions made at the Bar and after
carefully going through the materials available in the record, it is
pertinent to mention here that it is a settled principle of law as has been
reiterated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Uma
Shankar Gopalika vs. State of Bihar & Anr. reported in (2005) 10 SCC
336, paragraph-6 of which reads as under :-
“6. Xxxx xxxx xxxx It is well settled that every breach of contract
would not give rise to an offence of cheating and only in those
cases breach of contract would amount to cheating where there was
any deception played at the very inception. If the intention to cheat
has developed later on, the same cannot amount to cheating. In the
present case it
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.