SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 1632

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
GUDDI PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.334 of 2023 ------

1. Guddi Pandey, aged about 45 years, W/o Sri Sunil Dutt Pandey

2. Sunil Dutt Pandey @ Sunil Dutta, aged about 50 years, S/o Ram Vyas Pandey

3. Jeet Kumar @ Jeet, aged about 21 years, S/o Sri Sunil Dutt Pandey All R/o village – Gokul Dham Society, New Jail Road, P.O. &

P.S.- Bhopal, Dist.- Bhopal (M.P.) … Petitioners Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Saroj Tiwari, aged about 46 years, W/o Ram Prakash Tiwari, R/o village – Manaotand, Srikrishnapuri, P.O.- Dhanbad, P.S.- Dhansar, District- Dhanbad … Opposite Parties ------

For the Petitioners : Mr. Mukesh Bihari Lal, Advocate Mr. Avilash Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Nehala Sharmin, Spl. P.P.

For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Zeeshan Ahmad Khan, Advocate ------

P R E S E N T HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY By the Court:- Heard the parties.

2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with the prayer to quash the order dated 22.08.2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Dhansar P.S. Case No.172 of 2021 corresponding t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top