SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 1675

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
RAM LAL MAHTO – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA And ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.881 of 2009 -----

Ram Lal Mahto, son of Late Rameshwar Mahto, resident of village Dumardaga, Post Booty, Police Station Sadar, District Ranchi. … … Petitioner Versus

1. The Union of India through Chief Engineer, the Head Quarter Central Command, Lucknow-02.

2. The Chief Engineer, Jabalpur Zone, Bhagat Marg, Post Box No. 84, Jabalpur Cantonment 482001.

3. The SE / SG SOI (Personnel and Legal) for Chief Engineer, Jabalpur Zone, Bhagat Marg, Post Box No. 84, Jabalpur Cantonment 482001.

4. The Executive Engineer, Garrison Engineer, Ranchi … … Respondents -------

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD -------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Samavesh Bhanj Deo, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms. Bakshi Vibha, Advocate ------

Order No. 08/Dated 6th May, 2026 Prayer

1. The writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby and whereunder the decision as contained in letter dated 20.08.2002 (Annexure-7) by which the claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground has been rejected due to non- availability of sufficient vacancy within 5% quota and on the ground of delay.

Factual matrix

2. The brief facts of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top