SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 1796

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
KAMLESHWAR SAW – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ------

1. Kameshwar Saw aged about 47 years, 2. Jiblal Saw aged about 37 years, both sons of Peru Saw, Both residents of Village-Mathadih, P.O.-Parwatpur, P.S.-

Ahilyapur, District-Giridih.

… Appellants Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. XXX d/o XXX Resident of village-XXX, P.O.-XXX, P.S.-XXX, District-XXX.

… Respondents ------

For the Appellants : Mr. Shree Nivas Roy, Advocate For the State : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, Addl. P.P.

For the OP 2 : Mr. Arwind Kumar, Advocate ------

P R E S E N T HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY By the Court:- Heard the parties.

2. This Criminal Appeal (SJ) has been filed under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with the prayer to quash and set aside the order dated 08.12.2025 passed in M.C.A. No.2367 of 2025 by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Giridih in connection with Ahilyapur P.S. Case No.07 of 2025 whereby and whereunder the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Giridih has rejected the prayer for regular bail of the appellants on the ground that there is direct and specific allegation of assault against them and also the allegation of hurling abuse by c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top