SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 4656

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
SUNITA KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
RAJMANISH KUMAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No.120 of 2023 Sunita Kumari, aged about 38 years, w/o Rajmanish Kumar, D/o late Maharaj Kumar, R/o East Basuria, Road No.2, Indira Gandhi Chowk, Bhuli Nagar, PO and PS: East Basuria, District: Dhanbad, Jharkhand.

.… … Appellant/Respondent Versus Rajmanish Kumar, S/o Vijay Bhushan Prasad, R/o Kurmidih Bazar, Near Peepal Tree, PO-BS City-10, PS Balidih, Dist. Bokaro, Jharkhand. … … Respondent/Petitioner -------

CORAM:HON’BLEMR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI -------

For the Appellant :Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Debarsi Mondal, Advocate ---------

Order No. 08/Dated:30 th October, 2025

1. The instant appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is directed against the order/judgmentdated 8.5.2023 and the decree dated 12.5.2023 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro in connection with Original Suit No. 111 of 2021, whereby and whereunder, the petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against the appellant-wife for restitution of conjugal rights, has been allowed.

Factual Matrix

2. The brief facts of the case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top