Back
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J
Satyadeo Roy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties argument regarding lokayukta jurisdiction and alleged bias. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. court determination on the scope of lokayukta's power to direct investigation agencies. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 3. application of the doctrine of necessity regarding bias in single-member quasi-judicial institutions. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
19/ 09.06.2026: Heard Mr. Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rajendra Krishna, learned counsel for the respondent no.2, Mr. A.K. Mehta, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel representing the office of the Lokayukta, Jharkhand, who has been allowed to assist the Court by order dated 05.08.2022.
2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a declaration that order dated 30.04.2012 (Annexure-6) passed by respondent no.2 was contrary to Section 19 of the Jharkhand Lokayukta Act, 2001 read with section 13 (3) (ii) of the Jharkhand Lokayukta Act, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as “Act”) and consequently prayer has been ma
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
