SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 467

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
BHARAT BHUSAN – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH BAKSHI – Respondent


ORDER

1. The petitioner has challenged the complaint filed by the respondent against him, alleging commission of offences under Section 499/500 RPC, which is stated to be pending before the court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class (City Judge), Jammu.

2. As per allegations made in the impugned complaint, the petitioner/accused has made defamatory remarks against the respondent/complainant by addressing a communication to the Chairman, Cantonment Board, Jammu, a copy whereof was obtained by the respondent/complainant from the office of CEO, Cantonment Board. The contents of the alleged defamatory communication have been reproduced in the complaint and the same read as under:-

Aaj ki yeh meeting, jis mein W-2 ke member nain joe iljmaat board par lagaye hain uske baire mein yeh special meeting rakhi gaye hai. Jahan tak w-2 ke member ki baat hai unka rabaiya takreeban shuruu se he logoon kea aache kamoo mein aadanga dalne wala hai. Joe committee ghathit huie us committee nein inke kehne anusar beyond the power kaam kiya . hum nein koi aisa galat kaam nahi kiya us may committee ko Joe sahie lagah hum neih paisa kum karbaya ki jayda. Jab ke iis member ka agar iss committee mein naam h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top