Back
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, J
Ghulam Nabi Mir – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K and Ors – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashment of corrigendum and writ for re-tender (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments against the tender process integrity (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. arguments on the caveator's stance and tender requirements (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. court's overview of issues raised (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. judicial review and contractual integrity principles (Para 30 , 35 , 36 , 39 , 49) |
| 6. final judgment dismissing the petition (Para 60) |
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner through the medium of the instant petition, is seeking quashment of the corrigendum bearing No. CEJ/Ts/23862 dated 19.02.2023 and No. CEJ/TS/23863 dated 10.02.2023 and also the impugned order dated 26.04.2023 together with the summary evaluation uploaded dated 24.03.2023 and consequent three allotment order Nos. CEJ/TS/2347-51, CEJ/TS/2352-56 and CEJ/TS/2357-61 dated 01.05.2023, allotting the works in favour of respondent no. 4 by declaring the same as illegal besides seeking a writ of Mandamus for issuance of fresh tender/ re-tender in respect of all the three items of work.
BRIEF FACTS
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the instant case are that the Office of the Chief
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
