DR. RAFI RAMZAN DAR & ORS. ...PETITIONER(S)
Vs.
UT OF J&K & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
Oswal ‘J’
1) PSC(DR-P) of 2021 dated 03.09.2021 invited applications through online mode for the posts of Assistant Professor in different disciplines in Government Degree Colleges of Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir. The applications were also invited vide notification No.08-PSC(DR-P) of 2021 dated 18.08.2021 for the posts of Physical Training Instructor in Higher Education Department, Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir. The petitioners applied pursuant to the above mentioned notifications for the posts of Assistant Professor and Physical Training Instructor, as the case may be. It is claimed that the
Public Service Commission vide different notices shortlisted the petitioners for the interview for the posts applied for by them. The petitioners, who are 29 in number, have mentioned the particulars of petitioners No.1 to 27 only in para (8) of the petition while stating that they were shortlisted for the interview for the posts, they had applied for.
2) the candidates for the posts of Assistant Professor as well as Physical Training Instructor was to be made on the basis of weightage to the academic merit and on the basis of performance of the candidates in the interview/viva voce.
3) Chairpersonship of the Chief Secretary to review Rule 45 of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission (Business and Procedure) Rules, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules of 2021”). The said meeting was attended by the Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretary to Government, General Administration Department, Secretary to Government, Department of Law Justice & Parliamentary Affairs and Secretary, J&K Public Service Commission. In the aforesaid meeting, it was unanimously decided and proposed that the selection for the post of Assistant Professor/Librarian/PTI in Higher Education Department should be made on the basis of following criteria:
4) communication dated 22.09.2022 forwarded the minutes of the meeting held on 01.09.2022 to the respondent No.2 and thereafter the respondent No.1 vide communication dated 01.12.2022, requested the JKPSC to withdraw the posts advertised vide various notifications including the notifications referred above. The respondent No. 2 vide notification No.03-PSC (DR-P) of 2023 dated 01.02.2023 withdrew all the posts advertised vide different notifications including the notifications (supra).
5) communication dated 22.09.2022 read with notification No.03-PSC (DR-P) of 2023 dated 01.02.2023, assailed the same before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Srinagar Bench, and vide order dated 08.02.2023, the learned Tribunal, while issuing notice in the OA, disposed of the interim application filed by the petitioners by directing that the claim of the petitioners shall remain subject to outcome of the OA. During the pendency of that application before the learned Tribunal, the respondent No.2 re-advertised the posts of Assistant Professor and Physical Training Instruc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.