SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 386

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

CRM(M) No. 55/2021(O&M)

Reserved on 22.04.2024

Pronounced on 01.05.2024

1.

Brij Bhushan Singh Jamwal

S/o. Late Shri Vasdev Singh

Jamwal

R/o.

19-Exchange

Road, Jammu, at present,

Pakhian, Mishriwala, Jammu,

aged 60 years

2.

Kuljeet Singh S/o Late Shri

Rashpal Singh R/o. Shama

Chak, Jammu, aged 53 years

3.

Varindha Jamwal W/o. Shri

Brij Bhushan Singh Jamwal,

R/o.

19-Exchange

Road,

Jammu, at present Pakhian,

Mishriwala, Jammu, aged 55

years.

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Dinesh Singh Chouhan, Advocate

Ms. Damini Chouhan, Advocate

Vs

1.

Union Territory of Jammu and

Kashmir

through

its

Commissioner/Secretary

to

Government, Home Department,

J&K Government, Civil Secretariat,

Jammu

2.

Senior Superintendent of Police,

Jammu

3.

Station

House

Officer,

Police

Station, Bahu Fort, Jammu.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy.AG

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

JUDGEMENT

Mr. Adarsh Bhagat, GA for R 1 1. The petitioners, through the medium of this petition, have sought quashing of FIR bearing No. 337/2020 dated 07.12.2020 registered with Police Station, Bahu Fort, Jammu for offences under sections 341, 323, CRM(M) No. 55/2021 504 and 506 IPC at the instance of the complainant, Surinder Singh, who has not been arrayed as respondent in this petition.

2. It is stated that the petitioners had gone to Lemon Tree Hotel, near Railway Station, Jammu to attend marriage anniversary ceremony on 06.12.2020. The petitioner No. 1 had heated arguments with his brother, namely, Brij Raj Singh Jamwal, who had come with pre-determined mind but he went away after intervention of the petitioner No. 2. After the petitioners finished their dinner and were about to leave the venue, the accused persons, as mentioned in FIR bearing No. 335 registered under Sections 341,323,504 and 506 IPC dated 06.12.2020, attacked the petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 with an iron buckle of the belt and with fists and kicks, resulting into serious injuries. The petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 cried for help and were saved by the guests, who were present in the function. The accused persons were arrested by the Police Personnel standing outside the Lemon Tree Hospital when they tried to escape. After watching CCTV footages of Lemon Tree Hotel, the Police of Police Station, Bahu Fort, Jammu registered FIR bearing No. 0335 dated 06.12.2020 at 23:15 hours against the accused persons, namely, Gourish Jamwal S/o. Brij Raj Singh, Dimple W/o Brij Raj Singh, Brij Raj Singh S/o. Vasdev Singh, Surinder Singh S/o. Balbir Singh and Surjeet Singh S/o. Balbir Singh. The medical examination of petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 was conducted at Government Hospital, Sarwal. It is urged that as a counter claim to the FIR No. 0335 (supra) registered against the aforementioned accused persons, accused-Surinder Singh managed to get the impugned FIR registered on same set of allegations and incident.

CRM(M) No. 55/2021 3. The petitioners have impugned the FIR bearing No. 337 dated 07.12.2020 for offences under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 506 IPC registered with Police Station, Bahu Fort, on the grounds that the same could not have been registered in respect of same incident, more particularly when FIR in respect of same incident was already registered by the concerned Police Station. It is also urged that the offences as mentioned in the impugned FIR are not made out against the petitioners.

4. The respondents have filed the objections but in respect of some other FIR. However, the Investigating Officer has produced the Case Diary for the perusal of the Court.

5. Mr. D. S. Chouhan, learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that the second FIR could not have been registered against the petitioners, particularly when in respect of same occurrence, FIR stood already lodged by the petitioner No. 2.

6. Per contra , Mr. P. D. Singh, learned Dy.AG has vehemently argued that lodging of counter FIR in respect of same incident is permissible and one of the accused in first FIR, namely, Surinder Singh, who happens to be the complainant in the FIR impugned, was also injured in the incident, which is duly substantiated by the opinion of the Medical Officer.

7. Heard and perused the record.

8. The record depicts that initially an FIR bearing No. 335/2020 was registered on 06.12.2020 at 23.15 hours at the instance of petitioner No. 2 against Gourish Jamwal, Dimple, Brij Raj Singh, Surinder Singh and Surjeet Singh for offences under sections 341, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The said FIR was registered in respect of occurrence that took place at 21:45


          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          whatsapp-icon Back to top