SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 1597

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
ABDUL RASHID – Appellant
Versus
STATE TH.HOME DEPTT.AND ORS. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The charge sheet in FIR bearing No. 7/2013 dated 01.02.2013, registered with Police Station, Ramban, was filed against the respondent Nos. 3 to 17 on 29.07.2013 in the court of learned Sub-Judge (JMIC), Batote for commission of offences under sections 307, 147, 148, 427, 326, 323 and 201 RPC. The same was committed to the court of learned Sessions Judge, Ramban on same date itself. Learned Sessions Judge Ramban vide order dated 29.03.2014 discharged the respondent Nos. 3 to 17 for commission of offence under section 307 RPC and charged them for offences under sections 147, 148, 427, 336 and 323 RPC. Simultaneously, the challan was transferred to the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (Sub Judge), Batote (hereafter to be referred as “the trial court”).

2. In the charge sheet, 29 witnesses were cited by the prosecution to prove its case. Learned trial court after framing of charge, examined 11 witnesses i.e. PW-3 Gurmeet Singh, PW-4 Mohd. Rashid Malik, PW-5 Tahir Mehmood Magray, PW-6 Mohd. Yasir, PW-7 Sarfraz Ahmed, PW-17 Subash Chander, PW-18 Mohan Lal, PW-19 Abdul Rahid, PW-20 Aman Malik, PW-21 Gopal Singh. However, the person who had lodged the report i.e. P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top