JUDGEMENT

Heard.

1. Power, be it legislative, judicial and/or executive, is inherently chaste in its very existence, composition and character-wise, meant for amelioratory end or purpose of the State and its subjects but has an ever attending risk of abuse in course of its use and exercise at the hands of its repository ending up in a produce of perversion. To put it in a simple sentence an end situation of an abuse of power is in justice.

2. The judgement in this case is to replenish a message, patent and potent that the perversity of an action and/or decision by a public authority/official, acting in the domain of public administration, irrespective of tier of the administration, has no hiding from the pendular gaze of the Rule of Law which may for a given case get late but not defaults in catching up with the wrong deed and wrongdoer masquerading in the domain of the public administration.

3. The gullible petitioner herein is a below poverty line belonging young woman having husband with 50% upper limb permanent disability. The petitioner, who was supposed to be engaged as being at number one position in the panel, as an Anganwadi Worker on meager monthly honorarium, got duped of he