SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 903

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
MOHD HASSAN – Appellant
Versus
UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPT AND OTHERS – Respondent
WP(C) 21 / 2025



HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Reserved on: 01.09.2025 Pronounced on:11.09.2025 Case No.:- WP(C) No. 21/2025 Mohd. Hassan …..Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Abid Khan, Advocate.

Vs UT of J&K & ors .…. Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. B.S. Bali, Advocate for R-2 & 3.

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner, through the medium of the present petition, has challenged Order No. F(Certs-B) JD/2024 dated 24.12.2024 issued by respondent No. 3 whereby case of the petitioner for change of his name in the educational qualification certificates including High School and intermediate certificates has been rejected. The petitioner has further sought a direction upon the respondents to change his name from Raj Wali to Mohd Hassan in his educational qualification certificates including High School and intermediate certificates.

2. According to the petitioner, his original name was Raj Wali and the said name has been recorded in his educational qualification certificates including High School and intermediate certificates but he was seriously aggrieved of the said name as his friends used to make fun of his name. It has been submitted that the petitioner during his childhood could not effect change in his name as his parents were not willing to do so. Thus, the petitioner continued to study with the said name and accordingly, his name in the educational qualification certificates including High School and intermediate certificates is being reflected as Raj Wali s/o Mohd. Yaqub.

3. It has been pleaded that after the completion of graduation, the petitioner started the process of changing his name from Raj Wali to Mohd. Hassan. He applied to the Department of Publication, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Govt. of India for change of his name and submitted all the relevant documents and completed the requisite legal formalities, whereafter Notification dated 15.04.2023 came to be published in the Gazette of India in which it was declared that the petitioner has changed his name from Raj Wali to Mohd Hassan. After the publication of the changed name, his name was changed in other documents including Aadhar Card, Pan Card, Voter ID Card, Driving Licence, Passport and Domicile Certificate.

4. After undertaking the aforesaid exercise, the petitioner applied before the respondent-Board for effecting change in his name along with all the relevant documents. However, vide impugned order dated 24.12.2024, the respondent-Board has rejected case of the petitioner. Hence the present writ petition.

5. The petitioner has challenged the impugned action of the respondents on the grounds that the same is violative of his fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19(1) (a) and 21 of the Constitution of India. It has been further contended that the action of the respondents is not sustainable in law in view of the legal precedents laid down by various High Courts of the country including the Supreme Court of India. It has also been contended that the impugned action of the respondents is arbitrary and irrational.

6. The respondent-Board has contested the writ petition by filing its reply. In its reply, it has been submitted that the petitioner has passed matriculation examination from the Board in the year 2016 and he was provided the qualification certificate dated 11.05.2016 in which the name of the petitioner was shown as Raj Wali. The same particulars were shown in his

12th class qualification certificate but the petitioner did not approach the respondent-Board for change of his name. Only in the month of November, 2023, after more than three years from the date he had gained knowledge about the particulars reflected in the certificates issued by the respondent-Board, the petitioner approached the respondent-Board for effecting change in his name.

7. It has been submitted that the impugned order dated

24.12.2024 does not suffer from any illegality as the Correction Committee of the Board, after due consideration of the cas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top