HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
FAYAZ AHMAD TANTRAY – Appellant
Versus
MASRAT GULL – Respondent
Regular HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM (M) No. 339/2024 Fayaz Ahmad Tantray ….. Petitioner (s)
Through: Mr. Sheikh Mushtaq, Adv.
V/s Union Territory of J&K &anr ….. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Hanan Hussain, Adv.
Vice Mr. Azhar ul Amin, Adv.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar, Judge.
ORDER
11.11.2025
1. The petitioner has challenged order dated 04.03.2024 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Anantnag whereby interim compensation in terms of Section 143 A of the N I Act to the extent of 20% of the cheque amount has been awarded in favour of the complainant
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. A perusal of the impugned order would reveal that the learned Magistrate has awarded interim compensation to the extent of 20% of the cheque amount in favour of the respondent/complainant. However, it is not discernible from the contents of the order as to on what basis the learned Magistrate has proceeded to award the maximum amount of interim compensation under the provision of
143 A of N I Act.
4. It is settled law that the power to award interim compensation in terms of Section 143 A of N I Act is discretionary in nature. This disc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.