IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
MR. SANJEEV KUMAR, MR. SANJAY PARIHAR, JJ
M/s New Gee Enn & Sons – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge show cause notices. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background facts of cross-loc trade. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. gst liability of petitioners in cross-loc trade. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. arguments on jurisdiction of show cause notices. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. counterarguments regarding jurisdiction. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. determining nature of cross-loc trade. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. differences between section 73 and section 74. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. impugned notice analysis under section 74. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. limitation aspects of the impugned notice. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 10. bunching of show cause notices is permissible. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 11. availability of statutory remedy under cgst act. (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 12. conclusions regarding maintainability of petitions. (Para 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 13. final orders of the court. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
JUDGMENT
Per Sanjeev Kumar, J
1. In this batch of petitions, the petitioners invoke the extraordinary writ jurisdiction vested in this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to throw challenge to the show cause notices issued to them by the Superintendent,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.